It got the impression that you asserted that Yudkowsky’s work somehow has a central in a religious way to rationality.
To me the fact that CFAR started out with the idea that Bayesian might be important and then found in their research that teaching Bayes formula isn’t, is a prime example that rationality works differently than religion.
Things aren’t just taken as given and religiously believed.
It’s “notably and especially” part OF YUDKOWSKY’S WORK AND WHAT HE PROMOTES. It is a minor part of the characterization of rationalism.
This is legitimately such poor reading comprehension that I assume malice.
It got the impression that you asserted that Yudkowsky’s work somehow has a central in a religious way to rationality.
To me the fact that CFAR started out with the idea that Bayesian might be important and then found in their research that teaching Bayes formula isn’t, is a prime example that rationality works differently than religion.
Things aren’t just taken as given and religiously believed.