I think I agree with your comment except for the “but.” AFAICT it doesn’t contradict mine? In your parenthetical scenario, #3 also does not hold—the CDT agent has no negotiating power against the tit-for-tat bot.
I am not. I am only saying that #3 is sufficient to cover all iterative interactions where one player’s actions meaningfully alter the others’ outcomes.
I think I agree with your comment except for the “but.” AFAICT it doesn’t contradict mine? In your parenthetical scenario, #3 also does not hold—the CDT agent has no negotiating power against the tit-for-tat bot.
This confuses me. Are you saying the CDT agent does not have “the ability to alter outcomes of future interactions”?
I am not. I am only saying that #3 is sufficient to cover all iterative interactions where one player’s actions meaningfully alter the others’ outcomes.