Why do you care? Sure, these events might kill us, but do you expect them to influence your decisions?
Two years ago I sat in the audience of the Chaos Computer Congress when Julian Assange said that he got a leaked “North Pole”-confidental report with a list of persons who don’t get Christmas presents if they don’t do anything to advance politics in the right direction the common year. He handed out a bunch of codes so that everyone who got a code sort of new that he had to do something to get off the list.
I personally made a decision against actively working at Wikileaks or similar causes. I have more private information about myself in the public domain than would be wise if I would make those kinds of political moves myself. I still like to be one of the people who can hold a political conversation on the level that created a project like Wikileaks.
As a community of smart people I don’t think it’s useful to give up politics completely.
I didn’t mean to imply that you shouldn’t care about any politics, just that this topic sounds like gossip, not an attempt to “advance politics in the right direction.”
Isn’t this the worst argument in the world? I don’t think this topic is anywhere near the central element of the set “gossip”. Gossip is if we talk about the Kardashians.
Gossip has two meanings. One meaning is talking about people you know. That is real political coalition-building. The other is celebrity gossip, where you fool yourself into thinking that you are doing politics.
What the BBC writes could be classified as gossip. I don’t really disagree on that point.
Reading articles that are really intended to inform about the crisis in the Ukraine is however not gossip. To me it’s a major political event. I also live in Europe so it’s more important to me as it would be if I would live in the US.
I think that if you want to advance politics in the right direction you first have to understand the playing field. That means understanding major events.
I however won’t judge anybody who thinks that dealing with politics isn’t worth his time because he doesn’t see an effect on his actions.
Two years ago I sat in the audience of the Chaos Computer Congress when Julian Assange said that he got a leaked “North Pole”-confidental report with a list of persons who don’t get Christmas presents if they don’t do anything to advance politics in the right direction the common year. He handed out a bunch of codes so that everyone who got a code sort of new that he had to do something to get off the list.
I personally made a decision against actively working at Wikileaks or similar causes. I have more private information about myself in the public domain than would be wise if I would make those kinds of political moves myself. I still like to be one of the people who can hold a political conversation on the level that created a project like Wikileaks.
As a community of smart people I don’t think it’s useful to give up politics completely.
I didn’t mean to imply that you shouldn’t care about any politics, just that this topic sounds like gossip, not an attempt to “advance politics in the right direction.”
Isn’t this the worst argument in the world? I don’t think this topic is anywhere near the central element of the set “gossip”. Gossip is if we talk about the Kardashians.
It’s politics, though.
Gossip has two meanings. One meaning is talking about people you know. That is real political coalition-building. The other is celebrity gossip, where you fool yourself into thinking that you are doing politics.
I am sorry, but world politics is just not the same as gossip.
What the BBC writes could be classified as gossip. I don’t really disagree on that point.
Reading articles that are really intended to inform about the crisis in the Ukraine is however not gossip. To me it’s a major political event. I also live in Europe so it’s more important to me as it would be if I would live in the US.
I think that if you want to advance politics in the right direction you first have to understand the playing field. That means understanding major events.
I however won’t judge anybody who thinks that dealing with politics isn’t worth his time because he doesn’t see an effect on his actions.