Something must have trained it into 4.5.
I would not be nearly so confident about that as you...
How do you mean? That sentence is almost tautological to me: if an LLM shows a novel preference that it hasn’t shown before, then that preference must have come from its training somehow.
Oh, my mistake, I think I misread “something” as “someone.” Oops. Downvoting myself.
I would not be nearly so confident about that as you...
How do you mean? That sentence is almost tautological to me: if an LLM shows a novel preference that it hasn’t shown before, then that preference must have come from its training somehow.
Oh, my mistake, I think I misread “something” as “someone.” Oops. Downvoting myself.