EDIT: If you did, I am curious to know what you think I didn’t mention that I should mention re: criticisms. I also could see no other great post on Gödel’s ontological argument (which is, in meaningful ways, different from others such as Anselm’s). I thought it would make for interesting discussion!
Did you read the conclusion?
EDIT: If you did, I am curious to know what you think I didn’t mention that I should mention re: criticisms. I also could see no other great post on Gödel’s ontological argument (which is, in meaningful ways, different from others such as Anselm’s). I thought it would make for interesting discussion!
It reads like an essay arguing X with a tiny disclaimer at the end to cover yourself, but fair enough. I’ve retracted the downvote.
It is about a proof which argues X. Sorry, I’m quite a high decoupler. For what it’s worth, the proof truly does not convince me
EDIT: but thanks for letting me know how some may see it! :)