It is about a proof which argues X. Sorry, I’m quite a high decoupler. For what it’s worth, the proof truly does not convince me
EDIT: but thanks for letting me know how some may see it! :)
It is about a proof which argues X. Sorry, I’m quite a high decoupler. For what it’s worth, the proof truly does not convince me
EDIT: but thanks for letting me know how some may see it! :)