i should qualify that—you’re welcome to share my models and attribute them to me, but i don’t want to be like quoted in a new post that is sharing my views, recorded for a podcast, or something like that
Nod. That seems like a thing I can imagine some readers wanting, but, I am wondering if there is a way to avoid the things you are worried about while being able to meaningfully contribute more to public sensemaking, which seems like the actual thing that needs to happen.
while i’m still here, i’m obviously implicitly representing the org, so would want to discuss with people here before starting to effortpost or have others do so on my behalf
once i leave, i think i’ll have a bit more credibility to post/talk about this stuff without needing to talk my own book, and also be less constrained from the dimension of representing the org
Seems like a fine thing to want but means I don’t really see how the conversation would help anyone much.
i should qualify that—you’re welcome to share my models and attribute them to me, but i don’t want to be like quoted in a new post that is sharing my views, recorded for a podcast, or something like that
Do you mean “fine to share in person but not write up publicly online?”
yes, maybe i’ll edit to that.
Nod. That seems like a thing I can imagine some readers wanting, but, I am wondering if there is a way to avoid the things you are worried about while being able to meaningfully contribute more to public sensemaking, which seems like the actual thing that needs to happen.
while i’m still here, i’m obviously implicitly representing the org, so would want to discuss with people here before starting to effortpost or have others do so on my behalf
once i leave, i think i’ll have a bit more credibility to post/talk about this stuff without needing to talk my own book, and also be less constrained from the dimension of representing the org