Were you trying to do anything more interesting than the widely used system of natural units? The main purpose of that system is to save chalk and physicist brain power by avoiding the mention of all pesky factors of c, G, h, k_b, etc. that appear is all physical equations. Basically all particle physicists use that system of units everyday, and have been doing so for decades.
If units are somewhat arbitrary that still implies an infinite possibility space. Why did you believe you were likely to discover an overall improvement in finite time?
Were you trying to do anything more interesting than the widely used system of natural units? The main purpose of that system is to save chalk and physicist brain power by avoiding the mention of all pesky factors of c, G, h, k_b, etc. that appear is all physical equations. Basically all particle physicists use that system of units everyday, and have been doing so for decades.
I was trying to adapt natural units for everyday use.
What made you believe that they could be suitable in the first place?
Because units are (somewhat) arbitrary.
If units are somewhat arbitrary that still implies an infinite possibility space. Why did you believe you were likely to discover an overall improvement in finite time?
Where are you going with this line of questioning?
Well my last comment was over 4 months ago, so Iām not sure exactly.
Do you expect folks to remember their every intention within the last 4 months?
Just seeing from the comment chain I can offer some guesses, such as: