My inner Professor Quirrell is currently saying that if someone did have a moral policy in which animals had little-to-no value, they probably wouldn’t abuse their pets where we could see; it’d be as if someone had read Snuff and thought “That man was a fool. He shouldn’t have done that in public, because look what happened to him.” Someone who really didn’t care about animals in the slightest would still probably act like a normal member of society and just avoid interacting with animals whenever possible, because seeming like a stereotypical villain is going to be counterproductive for achieving your desires.
Wow. I have this strange feeling that someday, someone is going to look at the above paragraph and say “hath, you condone animal abuse?” or something to that effect. hopefully that doesn’t happen.
My inner Professor Quirrell is currently saying that if someone did have a moral policy in which animals had little-to-no value, they probably wouldn’t abuse their pets where we could see; it’d be as if someone had read Snuff and thought “That man was a fool. He shouldn’t have done that in public, because look what happened to him.” Someone who really didn’t care about animals in the slightest would still probably act like a normal member of society and just avoid interacting with animals whenever possible, because seeming like a stereotypical villain is going to be counterproductive for achieving your desires.
Wow. I have this strange feeling that someday, someone is going to look at the above paragraph and say “hath, you condone animal abuse?” or something to that effect. hopefully that doesn’t happen.
would not have a pet.
Yeah, you’re right. Oops.
I mean, you basically stated that*:
*unless you edited it.