. “Cannibal” name is also a quite weak evidence, of course, but in the context it still is quite notable.
Calling a restaurant you open “Cannibal” is supposed to be evidence for what? That it fits well into a narrative and thus would be a poor choice of someone with something to hide?
It can be evidence for the fact that the person
Why would many island visitors be so interested in this particular meal
If I would go over to a friend who only consumes a given meal for a while, I would be curious to try that meal.
But more concretely why do you think many island visitors were interested in this particular meal? The emails are mainly about Jeffery wanting to consume a lot of it (and it seems for a time no regular food and just beffy jerky). First Francis was the chef that cooked it and then when another chef called Steve from GUEST HOSPITALITY made it Jeffery wasn’t happy with the quality of it and you have people communicating about the recipe that Francis used to recreate it.
There are talks about finding the recipe which is:
Recipe : 2 lb of jerky
1/3organic tamari soy sause
3 tablespoon =weet soy sauce kecap Manis
2 tblsp ginger
2 tbs lemongrass ( fresh cut)
As far as delegation we have an email from Rachael Bova (working for GUEST HOSPITALITY 594 Broadway) to Lesley Groff (who was the assistent of Epstein saying):
Jeff had asked to have a sample of his beef jerky tested for nutritional value. Attached are the results I just received, please let me know if I can be of further assistance.
The attachment is titled (COA DEFAULT_EMAIL.pdf) COA standing for Certificate of Analysis is what you would expect for testing.
Doing nutritional testing to know whether or not to supplement something makes sense if you only eat a specific food.
Why would beef jerky “walk”?
That’s not what any email is saying the emails say things like: “Jojo is here and will walk the jerky over to Jeffrey...Please you just go on your own to Leon’s office. Melanie is Leon’s assistant I will alert Melanie you are coming to see Jeffrey. Reply back please! 🙂”
I think it’s quite plausible that a billionaire sits at their desk and has someone walk his meal over to them and that you have communication between assistants over that.
Okay, maybe you are correct. The point about “cannibal” name is deeper though—yes, it would be kinda stupid to feed theories which you would prefer to hide. On the other hand you may find it very funny to do “crime at the light of the day”/power move or advertisement with hint (anyway no one would expect such arrogance and take it seriously) . And it’s a priory very unlikely to call your restaurant cannibal, I suppose. So I think that the name is the evidence for the crimes, in the end.
Calling a restaurant you open “Cannibal” is supposed to be evidence for what? That it fits well into a narrative and thus would be a poor choice of someone with something to hide?
It can be evidence for the fact that the person
If I would go over to a friend who only consumes a given meal for a while, I would be curious to try that meal.
But more concretely why do you think many island visitors were interested in this particular meal? The emails are mainly about Jeffery wanting to consume a lot of it (and it seems for a time no regular food and just beffy jerky). First Francis was the chef that cooked it and then when another chef called Steve from GUEST HOSPITALITY made it Jeffery wasn’t happy with the quality of it and you have people communicating about the recipe that Francis used to recreate it.
There are talks about finding the recipe which is:
As far as delegation we have an email from Rachael Bova (working for GUEST HOSPITALITY 594 Broadway) to Lesley Groff (who was the assistent of Epstein saying):
The attachment is titled (COA DEFAULT_EMAIL.pdf) COA standing for Certificate of Analysis is what you would expect for testing.
Doing nutritional testing to know whether or not to supplement something makes sense if you only eat a specific food.
That’s not what any email is saying the emails say things like: “Jojo is here and will walk the jerky over to Jeffrey...Please you just go on your own to Leon’s office. Melanie is Leon’s assistant I will alert Melanie you are coming to see Jeffrey. Reply back please! 🙂”
I think it’s quite plausible that a billionaire sits at their desk and has someone walk his meal over to them and that you have communication between assistants over that.
Okay, maybe you are correct. The point about “cannibal” name is deeper though—yes, it would be kinda stupid to feed theories which you would prefer to hide. On the other hand you may find it very funny to do “crime at the light of the day”/power move or advertisement with hint (anyway no one would expect such arrogance and take it seriously) . And it’s a priory very unlikely to call your restaurant cannibal, I suppose. So I think that the name is the evidence for the crimes, in the end.