This kind of consideration seems extremely important and action-relevant (certainly relevant to how I feel about my current professional-bets), and I’m surprised it only has this much karma.
Yeah, I keep meaning to write some top-level post outlining my current vision of the strategic landscape. But I haven’t figured out what its general thrust/high-level organizing principle should be, and I feel that most of the specific points I’d cover have already been covered better elsewhere (e. g., Nesov’s model of LLMs’ RSI). I’ll keep thinking about it.
I’m surprised it only has this much karma
It was pretty controversial, the karma fluctuated up and down by 10+ points several times, I think it had 45+ at the highest point.
This kind of consideration seems extremely important and action-relevant (certainly relevant to how I feel about my current professional-bets), and I’m surprised it only has this much karma.
I’d advocate for top-level-posting this.
Yeah, I keep meaning to write some top-level post outlining my current vision of the strategic landscape. But I haven’t figured out what its general thrust/high-level organizing principle should be, and I feel that most of the specific points I’d cover have already been covered better elsewhere (e. g., Nesov’s model of LLMs’ RSI). I’ll keep thinking about it.
It was pretty controversial, the karma fluctuated up and down by 10+ points several times, I think it had 45+ at the highest point.