Thanks for including a “just want to see the results” option, though a question for that might have been better. I assume the 9999′s are screwing up the means.
Would anyone who thought the tech would be available in the fairly near future be willing to explain their line of thought?
Thanks for including a “just want to see the results” option, though a question for that might have been better. I assume the 9999′s are screwing up the means.
Would anyone who thought the tech would be available in the fairly near future be willing to explain their line of thought?
http://lesswrong.com/lw/m6b/thoughts_on_minimizing_designer_baby_drama/cd1x
I thought about that—but then some value still would be needed for the numeric result.
The mean you mean I guess.
I recommend looking at the raw numbers—it is easy.
You’re right. I meant the mean—I’ve corrected it.