I’ll post a description of each one of these skills as a comment, and if you think I am good at that skill, vote it up. If you think I am bad at it, vote it down. Don’t be too shy—even if you are biased or uncertain—because over the course of many votes, these biases and errors will cancel out to some extent. Thanks in advance!
The usual approach with this kind of thing is to include another comment as a karma sink for those who desire one. That can be expected to increase the accuracy of the feedback you infer.
I like the idea approach you are taking here. Proactive and rather bold. I’ve added a few votes here and there. I have to note, however, that I while I have a general positive impression of your posts I haven’t built up a particularly clear model of how you think. This is, all else being equal a good thing. I mostly form models of people’s thought processes when they have obvious biasses that I find damn irritating.
The usual approach with this kind of thing is to include another comment as a karma sink for those who desire one. That can be expected to increase the accuracy of the feedback you infer.
I like the idea approach you are taking here. Proactive and rather bold. I’ve added a few votes here and there. I have to note, however, that I while I have a general positive impression of your posts I haven’t built up a particularly clear model of how you think. This is, all else being equal a good thing. I mostly form models of people’s thought processes when they have obvious biasses that I find damn irritating.
Downvote some of the things you think I am bad at, or less good at. I appreciate the feedback!