I’m not sure that follows. It could depend on the structure of the universe. While many or most states are reached there could be unreached areas due to being outside of attractors. Even a random walk in three dimensions doesn’t reach all points.
This objection may works for some strange astrophysical object, like cubic-size stars. If we limit our idea of observers to the finite (and not too large) size Turing machines, it seems unlikely. Any such observer could appear via random generating of a file.
I think by adding in the constraint of turning machines, you increase the complexity and thus reduce the likelihood, not increase it. Now you require Turing machines in the first place.
I’m not sure that follows. It could depend on the structure of the universe. While many or most states are reached there could be unreached areas due to being outside of attractors. Even a random walk in three dimensions doesn’t reach all points.
This objection may works for some strange astrophysical object, like cubic-size stars. If we limit our idea of observers to the finite (and not too large) size Turing machines, it seems unlikely. Any such observer could appear via random generating of a file.
I think by adding in the constraint of turning machines, you increase the complexity and thus reduce the likelihood, not increase it. Now you require Turing machines in the first place.
Turing machines are rather universal thing which will appear many times everywhere, so I don’t see how it reduces the likelihood.
[edited]
I don’t see a problem here, I will win in another branch of MWI. Or I miss something?