You’re equivocating between MWi-QI, which entails the same physical laws, and something like Tegmarks MU, which doesn’t. You should pick one, or explicitly note when you switch.
This distinction is irrelevant to the main point: I expect to experience living forever without experiencing unusual luck. This is true regardless of whether MWi-QI or Tegmark’s MU theory is more accurate.
The specific example is wrong in mere MWI, as is some of the comments here.
If we fix the physical laws as constant, and merely vary over the wave function, it’s not clear how “unlucky” worlds are more likely, or what a lucky world would look like. I think you should change the reference from mwi to mu, or else explicitly analyze both.
You’re equivocating between MWi-QI, which entails the same physical laws, and something like Tegmarks MU, which doesn’t. You should pick one, or explicitly note when you switch.
This distinction is irrelevant to the main point: I expect to experience living forever without experiencing unusual luck. This is true regardless of whether MWi-QI or Tegmark’s MU theory is more accurate.
The specific example is wrong in mere MWI, as is some of the comments here.
If we fix the physical laws as constant, and merely vary over the wave function, it’s not clear how “unlucky” worlds are more likely, or what a lucky world would look like. I think you should change the reference from mwi to mu, or else explicitly analyze both.