Thank you. Okay, so he’s saying here that people who kill themselves are dissected… which implies that people who die of some other cause are not usually dissected?
If people who kill themselves are dissected more frequently than others, then what is the reason for that? My guess is that they suspect foul play more often, but for all I know it has to do with looking for specific brain diseases that cause depression or it’s some vestigial behavior left over from the days when they used leeches.
which implies that people who die of some other cause are not usually dissected?
Relatively few disease or old-age related deaths result in autopsy (even though they’re a good idea since they routinely reveal wrong diagnoses).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autopsy#Forensic_autopsy The reason why suicides would be mandated to be autopsied in some states is pretty obvious: murders can look a lot like a suicide. As well, the close proximity of a suicide to preservation can raise questions about whether the cryonics people hurried it up and committed murder—ALCOR had a close call in the Dora Kent incident.
Thanks for this. That’s really too bad. In my view, there really needs to be some sort of protocol that terminally ill patients can follow that guarantees they’ll be frozen in the event that they choose to exercise their right to die. Maybe there is one implied by “in rare cases” and I am not aware of it?
dissected edit: looks like I was wrong
I don’t think so. See above.
Thank you. Okay, so he’s saying here that people who kill themselves are dissected… which implies that people who die of some other cause are not usually dissected?
If people who kill themselves are dissected more frequently than others, then what is the reason for that? My guess is that they suspect foul play more often, but for all I know it has to do with looking for specific brain diseases that cause depression or it’s some vestigial behavior left over from the days when they used leeches.
Relatively few disease or old-age related deaths result in autopsy (even though they’re a good idea since they routinely reveal wrong diagnoses).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autopsy#Forensic_autopsy The reason why suicides would be mandated to be autopsied in some states is pretty obvious: murders can look a lot like a suicide. As well, the close proximity of a suicide to preservation can raise questions about whether the cryonics people hurried it up and committed murder—ALCOR had a close call in the Dora Kent incident.
These requirements and dangers are why cryonics groups don’t handle suicidees except, AFAIK, in rare cases where there is no suspicion of foul play and autopsy can be avoided like Kim Suozzi avoiding food & drink while terminal. Some links: http://www.alcor.org/FAQs/faq06.html#death http://www.alcor.org/Library/html/casereport9304.html
Thanks for this. That’s really too bad. In my view, there really needs to be some sort of protocol that terminally ill patients can follow that guarantees they’ll be frozen in the event that they choose to exercise their right to die. Maybe there is one implied by “in rare cases” and I am not aware of it?