If you are a new user and submit a post that substantially consists of content inside of LLM content blocks, it is pretty unlikely that it will get approved[8]. This does not suddenly become wise if you’re an approved user. If you’re confident that people will want to read it, then sure, go ahead, but please pay close attention to the kind of feedback you get (karma, comments, etc), and if this proves noisy we’ll probably just tell people to cut it out.
I took this to indicate that the ban on LLM content applied specifically to posting it outside of LLM blocks. I don’t know what this paragraph could mean if substantial LLM usage will be blanket banned (“go ahead” and post something the Pangram filter will throw right in the trash?), @habryka can you clarify?
Yes, obviously content in the new LLM Content Block elements is excluded from the automated LLM content detection; how would it even be possible to use them otherwise?
Thanks for clarifying. So posts that place 100% of their content within will be approved? What about 50%? 45%? Will this content be disadvantaged? I think a lot of the same concerns apply, even if this policy is somewhat less strict than I thought.
We apply higher standards to posts by new users (in-particular we say in the onboarding docs and the new post page that your first post to LessWrong is kind of like a job application). This is just saying that a post co-written by AI will likely cause you to not meet that bar (though it’s not guaranteed!).
I took this to indicate that the ban on LLM content applied specifically to posting it outside of LLM blocks. I don’t know what this paragraph could mean if substantial LLM usage will be blanket banned (“go ahead” and post something the Pangram filter will throw right in the trash?), @habryka can you clarify?
Yes, obviously content in the new LLM Content Block elements is excluded from the automated LLM content detection; how would it even be possible to use them otherwise?
Thanks for clarifying. So posts that place 100% of their content within will be approved? What about 50%? 45%? Will this content be disadvantaged? I think a lot of the same concerns apply, even if this policy is somewhat less strict than I thought.
We apply higher standards to posts by new users (in-particular we say in the onboarding docs and the new post page that your first post to LessWrong is kind of like a job application). This is just saying that a post co-written by AI will likely cause you to not meet that bar (though it’s not guaranteed!).