It just seems unlikely to be Bayesian evidence. Would you also feature those who left OpenAI and regretted it? If not, I expect that any competent “Omnicider” will see this as clearly as we do.
I’m not following (or I disagree). Even without that sort of feature, it would provide Bayesian evidence of lots of things (e.g. “this is feasible as opposed to not feasible” and “here’s some details about how this can work well in some cases”), as well as accomplishing other perfectly legitimate purposes of discourse (such as “making the possibility feel real” and communicating about social intentions such as social reward for leaving).
It just seems unlikely to be Bayesian evidence. Would you also feature those who left OpenAI and regretted it? If not, I expect that any competent “Omnicider” will see this as clearly as we do.
I’m not following (or I disagree). Even without that sort of feature, it would provide Bayesian evidence of lots of things (e.g. “this is feasible as opposed to not feasible” and “here’s some details about how this can work well in some cases”), as well as accomplishing other perfectly legitimate purposes of discourse (such as “making the possibility feel real” and communicating about social intentions such as social reward for leaving).