I’m not following (or I disagree). Even without that sort of feature, it would provide Bayesian evidence of lots of things (e.g. “this is feasible as opposed to not feasible” and “here’s some details about how this can work well in some cases”), as well as accomplishing other perfectly legitimate purposes of discourse (such as “making the possibility feel real” and communicating about social intentions such as social reward for leaving).
I’m not following (or I disagree). Even without that sort of feature, it would provide Bayesian evidence of lots of things (e.g. “this is feasible as opposed to not feasible” and “here’s some details about how this can work well in some cases”), as well as accomplishing other perfectly legitimate purposes of discourse (such as “making the possibility feel real” and communicating about social intentions such as social reward for leaving).