Granted that they are not very tasteful in their approach I’m happy to call that agreed. Do you disagree with the content (rather than the form) of what they posted?
I think it’s germane to the conversation to clarify your position in relation to the posts you haven’t retweeted on an account you’ve otherwise endorsed.
I think it’s germane to the conversation to clarify your position in relation to the posts you haven’t retweeted on an account you’ve otherwise endorsed.
I dispute that retweeting something means that you endorse the account, as opposed to only the specific thing that you retweeted.
I think that’s a fair point; I’m willing to stand corrected as over-reading his position if Richard would like to object. I remain interested in his response to my question regarding agreement/disagreement with the content of those posts either way.
Granted that they are not very tasteful in their approach I’m happy to call that agreed. Do you disagree with the content (rather than the form) of what they posted?
I think it’s germane to the conversation to clarify your position in relation to the posts you haven’t retweeted on an account you’ve otherwise endorsed.
I dispute that retweeting something means that you endorse the account, as opposed to only the specific thing that you retweeted.
I think that’s a fair point; I’m willing to stand corrected as over-reading his position if Richard would like to object. I remain interested in his response to my question regarding agreement/disagreement with the content of those posts either way.