has completely and totally integrated IQ differences into their ontology. There’s no hem and hawing, they’ve just accepted it as part of their worldview.
Just noting that these are different things, and I think Richard is attempting to point at the differences between them.
eg, he’s claiming that Scott probably believes that there are group differences in intelligence (it’s a part of his worldview), but is also flinching away from propagating all the implications.
(However this doesn’t bear on the main thrust of your comment.
eg, he’s claiming that Scott probably believes that there are group differences in intelligence (it’s a part of his worldview), but is also flinching away from propagating all the implications.
Right, and what I’m saying is that they’re very explicit about it and propagate the implications.
Just noting that these are different things, and I think Richard is attempting to point at the differences between them.
eg, he’s claiming that Scott probably believes that there are group differences in intelligence (it’s a part of his worldview), but is also flinching away from propagating all the implications.
(However this doesn’t bear on the main thrust of your comment.
Right, and what I’m saying is that they’re very explicit about it and propagate the implications.