The most likely explanation is simply that I messed up. As I was reading back the text in that section I felt a little confused and decided to make a diagram for it. I showed the diagram to Eliezer and said, “Should I include this? It’s practically begging for people to point out all the things I got wrong.” He made a few corrections of his own and then we decided to ship it.
Anyway, keep nitpicking[1], I’ll revise/fix the mistakes as a batch in a few days. (Busy this weekend.)
The most likely explanation is simply that I messed up. As I was reading back the text in that section I felt a little confused and decided to make a diagram for it. I showed the diagram to Eliezer and said, “Should I include this? It’s practically begging for people to point out all the things I got wrong.” He made a few corrections of his own and then we decided to ship it.
Anyway, keep nitpicking[1], I’ll revise/fix the mistakes as a batch in a few days. (Busy this weekend.)
Where “nitpicking” here is not meant negatively, I appreciate constructive criticism a lot and prefer for my articles to be correct!
Another nitpick, but footnote 14 is wrong: Tonks was a metamorphmagus, not using polyjuice.
Fixed, thank you!
I have now fixed the chart, thanks again!