“PLEASE CHANGE IT!” The vast majority of CeSIA’s impact (99%) is not via our website but through the rest of our engagement, so I don’t consider this a priority, even though putting the FAQ on AI risks back on our backlog will be done at some point. The role of the website is mostly to open doors.
How do you know? Even when the intended impact is not via the website it’s still possible that the website has more impact that you intend to and that impact is negative.
Hi Charbel, Sorry, looking back now at my comment it’s pretty weird and too strongly worded. Especially asking you to change it right now and checking back. Thank you, for your very diplomatic answer! Maybe to rephrase it how I would write it now: I agree that it would be good to have the Q&A back on the website. I think the “invisible cost” of not having “Risk of loss of control” present is often underestimated. I am not saying that as useful assistant one can’t help with the topic of the day without mentioning x-risk, but that the cost of systematically keeping it out of sight is often underestimated. And I have seen people who have been in the community for years, feel awkward talking directly about the topic. Best regards, Benjamin
Thanks Benjamin.
“PLEASE CHANGE IT!” The vast majority of CeSIA’s impact (99%) is not via our website but through the rest of our engagement, so I don’t consider this a priority, even though putting the FAQ on AI risks back on our backlog will be done at some point. The role of the website is mostly to open doors.
But thanks for the feedback.
How do you know? Even when the intended impact is not via the website it’s still possible that the website has more impact that you intend to and that impact is negative.
number of visitors on our website vs number of views on videos such as https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZP7T6WAK3Ow
Hi Charbel,
Sorry, looking back now at my comment it’s pretty weird and too strongly worded. Especially asking you to change it right now and checking back. Thank you, for your very diplomatic answer!
Maybe to rephrase it how I would write it now: I agree that it would be good to have the Q&A back on the website. I think the “invisible cost” of not having “Risk of loss of control” present is often underestimated. I am not saying that as useful assistant one can’t help with the topic of the day without mentioning x-risk, but that the cost of systematically keeping it out of sight is often underestimated. And I have seen people who have been in the community for years, feel awkward talking directly about the topic.
Best regards,
Benjamin