Hi Charbel, Sorry, looking back now at my comment it’s pretty weird and too strongly worded. Especially asking you to change it right now and checking back. Thank you, for your very diplomatic answer! Maybe to rephrase it how I would write it now: I agree that it would be good to have the Q&A back on the website. I think the “invisible cost” of not having “Risk of loss of control” present is often underestimated. I am not saying that as useful assistant one can’t help with the topic of the day without mentioning x-risk, but that the cost of systematically keeping it out of sight is often underestimated. And I have seen people who have been in the community for years, feel awkward talking directly about the topic. Best regards, Benjamin
Hi Charbel,
Sorry, looking back now at my comment it’s pretty weird and too strongly worded. Especially asking you to change it right now and checking back. Thank you, for your very diplomatic answer!
Maybe to rephrase it how I would write it now: I agree that it would be good to have the Q&A back on the website. I think the “invisible cost” of not having “Risk of loss of control” present is often underestimated. I am not saying that as useful assistant one can’t help with the topic of the day without mentioning x-risk, but that the cost of systematically keeping it out of sight is often underestimated. And I have seen people who have been in the community for years, feel awkward talking directly about the topic.
Best regards,
Benjamin