A key question is has the threat of anything prompted a nuclear exchange?The answer is no.Has the threat of even a supposed nuclear exchange from faulty sensors prompted a nuclear exchange?No.
A key question is has the threat of anything prompted a nuclear exchange?
The answer is no.
Has the threat of even a supposed nuclear exchange from faulty sensors prompted a nuclear exchange?
No.
How are these points relevant to what was being discussed?
I don’t think the opposing stance for these two question was implied.
The history of (or lack of) nuclear exchanges seems relevant to discussing whether they will be effective at enforcing treaties.
What specifically do these questions relate to in the preceding comment, the one it’s replying to? Or to Jeffrey’s comment before that?
How are these points relevant to what was being discussed?
I don’t think the opposing stance for these two question was implied.
The history of (or lack of) nuclear exchanges seems relevant to discussing whether they will be effective at enforcing treaties.
What specifically do these questions relate to in the preceding comment, the one it’s replying to? Or to Jeffrey’s comment before that?