what fraction of people actually remember their state’s official rotary rules?
Almost everywhere has standardized on a rule where the people already in the rotary have right of way. I’d expect that in areas with a lot of rotaries, 85%+ of the drivers know this (including knowing it implicitly).
if most of the traffic is way over the speed limit, then driving slowly is dangerous
It’s legal to drive well below the speed limit, which can put you at a very high delta two other cars, and I agree that can be unsafe, but driving at the speed limit? I’m having trouble thinking of any places where the average speed is so much higher than the limit that the safety benefits of being closer to the speed of other cars would outweigh the safety benefits of slower driving.
It’s a case where I’d at least be cautious about High-Modernism-ing in and implementing new rules
I don’t know; traffic flow seems like a place where clear rules have generally worked extremely well, and NJ is pretty much the only place not using the standard rule?
I’m having trouble thinking of any places where the average speed is so much higher than the limit that the safety benefits of being closer to the speed of other cars would outweigh the safety benefits of slower driving.
Some parts of Route 2 in MA seem this way to me. Some of the stretches between I-95 and I-495 have a speed limit of 40-45 but an average speed of 65-70.
The MA drivers manual says to never drive over the speed limit (of course), but it also says to drive at the speed of traffic and not slow down cars behind you if you are in the second lane of a highway (p104). The intersection of these guidelines is unclear.
Some parts of Route 2 in MA seem this way to me. Some of the stretches between I-95 and I-495 have a speed limit of 40-45 but an average speed of 65-70.
Funnily enough, I drove this yesterday, and also happened to have a conversation with my kids about speeding. I tried driving exactly the speed limit, in the right lane, and while pretty much everyone was passing me, the speed delta was pretty low and it didn’t feel unsafe. I agree this is not how people usually drive that road, though.
The MA drivers manual says to never drive over the speed limit (of course), but it also says to drive at the speed of traffic and not slow down cars behind you if you are in the second lane of a highway (p104). The intersection of these guidelines is unclear.
My reading is that driving in the right lane, at the speed limit, is the maximally legal option?
Almost everywhere has standardized on a rule where the people already in the rotary have right of way. I’d expect that in areas with a lot of rotaries, 85%+ of the drivers know this (including knowing it implicitly).
It’s legal to drive well below the speed limit, which can put you at a very high delta two other cars, and I agree that can be unsafe, but driving at the speed limit? I’m having trouble thinking of any places where the average speed is so much higher than the limit that the safety benefits of being closer to the speed of other cars would outweigh the safety benefits of slower driving.
I don’t know; traffic flow seems like a place where clear rules have generally worked extremely well, and NJ is pretty much the only place not using the standard rule?
Some parts of Route 2 in MA seem this way to me. Some of the stretches between I-95 and I-495 have a speed limit of 40-45 but an average speed of 65-70.
The MA drivers manual says to never drive over the speed limit (of course), but it also says to drive at the speed of traffic and not slow down cars behind you if you are in the second lane of a highway (p104). The intersection of these guidelines is unclear.
Funnily enough, I drove this yesterday, and also happened to have a conversation with my kids about speeding. I tried driving exactly the speed limit, in the right lane, and while pretty much everyone was passing me, the speed delta was pretty low and it didn’t feel unsafe. I agree this is not how people usually drive that road, though.
My reading is that driving in the right lane, at the speed limit, is the maximally legal option?