This isn’t even advanced rationality—it’s reductionism 101.
Rather it’s self-defeating reductionism, of the kind where you start by arguing that the only meaningful questions are based on experiences and anticipated experiences, and end by concluding that the concept of “experience” is meaningless.
Rather it’s self-defeating reductionism, of the kind where you start by arguing that the only meaningful questions are based on experiences and anticipated experiences, and end by concluding that the concept of “experience” is meaningless.