From their perspective, I suppose they have met their regulatory burden, so they are proactively going beyond the mark in breaking down these operations.
It begs the question what their less safety-conscious kin are doing to prevent misuse of their tools. Meta’s recent AI policy leak shows a fairly laissez-faire attitude.
Perhaps, but they are taking action and deserve to be lauded for that, at least. I admit I’m side-eyeing the framing and the implication that there’s very much they can do to stop this occurring again in the future, but I am glad they chose to do the work and write about it.
It strikes me that Anthropic’s blog post is engaging in a bit of double-speak in saying they are “disrupting” the operations of cybercriminals.
What they are describing is retroactively taking action after crime has occurred.
it seems like the operations were ongoing, and they disrupted them.to me it appears a normal and legitimate use of the word.
From their perspective, I suppose they have met their regulatory burden, so they are proactively going beyond the mark in breaking down these operations.
It begs the question what their less safety-conscious kin are doing to prevent misuse of their tools. Meta’s recent AI policy leak shows a fairly laissez-faire attitude.
Perhaps, but they are taking action and deserve to be lauded for that, at least. I admit I’m side-eyeing the framing and the implication that there’s very much they can do to stop this occurring again in the future, but I am glad they chose to do the work and write about it.