Deontology with correct rules is indistiguishable from Consequentialism with aligned goals and perfect information. The same actions will be chosen via each method
Presumably, optimisation of consequences. But the catch is that they would need to be infinitely complex to match a consequentualist calculation of unlimited complexity
Deontology with correct rules is indistiguishable from Consequentialism with aligned goals and perfect information. The same actions will be chosen via each method
What exactly does ‘correct’ mean here?
Presumably, optimisation of consequences. But the catch is that they would need to be infinitely complex to match a consequentualist calculation of unlimited complexity