Would you be willing to summarize the point you’re making at the object level? Is it something like “the Soviets had to make the Molotov Ribbentrop pact, and that doesn’t say anything meaningful about their cultural approach to the interaction of world religions”? I don’t want to put words in your mouth or anything, I just want to understand the “extremely low-epistemics” bit.
It’s something I’m not really comfortable talking about with anonymous people on the internet. I’m really sorry for the inefficiency, but I’ve done as much as I can to share as much as I can.
I think it’s understandable not wanting to talk about present conflicts openly. I’m more surprised about your feeling that you can’t openly talk about what happened more than 50 years ago.
Can you say more about why you believe it’s hard to talk about history?
Would you be willing to summarize the point you’re making at the object level? Is it something like “the Soviets had to make the Molotov Ribbentrop pact, and that doesn’t say anything meaningful about their cultural approach to the interaction of world religions”? I don’t want to put words in your mouth or anything, I just want to understand the “extremely low-epistemics” bit.
It’s something I’m not really comfortable talking about with anonymous people on the internet. I’m really sorry for the inefficiency, but I’ve done as much as I can to share as much as I can.
I think it’s understandable not wanting to talk about present conflicts openly. I’m more surprised about your feeling that you can’t openly talk about what happened more than 50 years ago.
Can you say more about why you believe it’s hard to talk about history?