Like suppose option A gets utility −47. And option B gets 99% chance of −48 and 1% of 952.
You seem to define loosing as any outcome of utility below −47.5, and then ask why choose outcome B that usually looses.
You could just as well define a loss as any state below 150 and say outcome B is obviously better because its the only state with any chance of winning.
Your use of the word loose is interesting.
Like suppose option A gets utility −47. And option B gets 99% chance of −48 and 1% of 952.
You seem to define loosing as any outcome of utility below −47.5, and then ask why choose outcome B that usually looses.
You could just as well define a loss as any state below 150 and say outcome B is obviously better because its the only state with any chance of winning.
Yes, but loose ≠ lose.