Yes, however a version of skepticism that claims that nothing can be known for sure/​justified beyond any doubt doesn’t have this problem.
But how much is this still properly skepticism, then, instead of justified uncertainty?
The point of the exercise is to add skepticism to normality. Skepticism is the starting point. Justified uncertainty is the goal. The journey between the two is the exercise.
But how much is this still properly skepticism, then, instead of justified uncertainty?
The point of the exercise is to add skepticism to normality. Skepticism is the starting point. Justified uncertainty is the goal. The journey between the two is the exercise.