Should be main.
I tend to agree.
Some minor questions improvements to rough corners:
In the first table the predictors “Education Level” and “Cognitive Ability” are not explained nor referred to.
In the second table the tactic “Rendering Favors” has no description and I’m not clear what that might be. I’d like to see an example.
dito for the third table. And if it’s a simple “see above”.
“The Dilbert Effect” used as title but not really related to in text. I think I know what is meant but it’s really not clear.
Also I’d like to see a quote about the lab experiments to get a feel of type of politics gamed.
Should be main.
I tend to agree.
Some minor questions improvements to rough corners:
In the first table the predictors “Education Level” and “Cognitive Ability” are not explained nor referred to.
In the second table the tactic “Rendering Favors” has no description and I’m not clear what that might be. I’d like to see an example.
dito for the third table. And if it’s a simple “see above”.
“The Dilbert Effect” used as title but not really related to in text. I think I know what is meant but it’s really not clear.
Also I’d like to see a quote about the lab experiments to get a feel of type of politics gamed.