Traditional schools have solved all of them, and can teach people predictably without requiring much motivation
Traditional schools know how to teach welding but when it comes to teaching introspection or teaching teaching and tutoring skill it’s less clear.
Teachers who have a master degree aren’t better than their colleges. As far as we know those two years of being in the university to learn to teach better is worthless for teaching skills.
I would also doubt that it’s easier to learn programming via a community college course than by living together with people who can program well and who are willing to tutor you a bit.
I’m sorry to say but teaching introspection, rationality or other skills we don’t have reliable tests for is a scam. The fact that more than half of the OP’s curriculum consists of such skills is a big red flag. And learning programming doesn’t require any measures described in the OP, I know it, you know it.
And learning programming doesn’t require any measures described in the OP, I know it, you know it.
Yes, but you make the argument that traditional institutions of learning are superior. For programming, I don’t think that’s the case.
I’m sorry to say but teaching introspection, rationality or other skills we don’t have reliable tests for is a scam.
Do you believe that liberal arts college who claim to teach critical thinking are also scams? From my perspective, they are a lot more scammy because they actually have the money and time to research whether their claims are true.
I think a person who tries a new project where they have a goal that they can’t measure well is a lot scammy than big institutions like a liberal art college.
Traditional schools know how to teach welding but when it comes to teaching introspection or teaching teaching and tutoring skill it’s less clear.
Teachers who have a master degree aren’t better than their colleges. As far as we know those two years of being in the university to learn to teach better is worthless for teaching skills.
I would also doubt that it’s easier to learn programming via a community college course than by living together with people who can program well and who are willing to tutor you a bit.
I’m sorry to say but teaching introspection, rationality or other skills we don’t have reliable tests for is a scam. The fact that more than half of the OP’s curriculum consists of such skills is a big red flag. And learning programming doesn’t require any measures described in the OP, I know it, you know it.
Yes, but you make the argument that traditional institutions of learning are superior. For programming, I don’t think that’s the case.
Do you believe that liberal arts college who claim to teach critical thinking are also scams? From my perspective, they are a lot more scammy because they actually have the money and time to research whether their claims are true.
I think a person who tries a new project where they have a goal that they can’t measure well is a lot scammy than big institutions like a liberal art college.
100% agree that formal education for programming sucks today.
Yeah, pretty much. They take your money and then you can get a job doing something else if you’re good at that thing.
I think we’re mostly in agreement?