I’m in the “would probably like to be in round 2 of the experiment” camp (I think there’s probably a frustratingly large number of people in that camp and a frustratingly small number in the “let’s do this!” camp. I hope there’s enough of the latter for this to work.
My main question (which you may or may not yet know the answer to) is “if you don’t have a Duncan, what version of this experiment would you recommend running?
Get your house together and start a norm of “ironclad try-things experiments” lasting no less than two weeks and no more than four (with overlap or not being up to you). So, you have a regular house meeting where you all say, “What thing to we want to try, and top-down make ourselves keep trying past the first possible warning signs, because we suspect there’s value on the far side of the valley?”
And then you run something like eight full experiments before you abandon the meta-norm.
I’m in the “would probably like to be in round 2 of the experiment” camp (I think there’s probably a frustratingly large number of people in that camp and a frustratingly small number in the “let’s do this!” camp. I hope there’s enough of the latter for this to work.
My main question (which you may or may not yet know the answer to) is “if you don’t have a Duncan, what version of this experiment would you recommend running?
Get your house together and start a norm of “ironclad try-things experiments” lasting no less than two weeks and no more than four (with overlap or not being up to you). So, you have a regular house meeting where you all say, “What thing to we want to try, and top-down make ourselves keep trying past the first possible warning signs, because we suspect there’s value on the far side of the valley?”
And then you run something like eight full experiments before you abandon the meta-norm.
Cool. Makes sense.