aiiixiii

• aiiixiii 28 Apr 2020 16:23 UTC

  1 point

  in reply to: leggi’s comment on: Poll: ask any­thing to an all-know­ing de­mon edition

  how would you change the question between the two cases?

• aiiixiii 23 Apr 2020 18:11 UTC

  2 points

  in reply to: Vanessa Kosoy’s comment on: Poll: ask any­thing to an all-know­ing de­mon edition

  Think of this scenario: I ask “is everything I am doing the optimal for my subjective preferences?” Now think at your question. It is provable that the oracle answer yes (or no) to my question if and only if the oracle answer yes (or no) to your question, and vice-versa. This make my question a better choice since it is less complex (less bits). If you try to schematize some possible cases, you will see that the answer of the oracle in my example and yours is always the same.

• aiiixiii 8 Mar 2020 20:30 UTC

  1 point

  in reply to: TAG’s comment on: A Proof Against Or­a­cle AI

  What do you mean by “where the motivation comes from”?

• aiiixiii 15 Nov 2019 17:50 UTC

  −1 points

  in reply to: gjm’s comment on: Logic: a Primer

  Thanks for the clarification, I correct the error. As for the second point, who says we have to lock up the killers for decades? Just because this is what the system currently does does not mean it is right. The most rational way would be to use criminals as a workforce, there is no more important resource for a Nation and if you think about the number of convicts who remain to rot at the expense of the state I think this would be the absolute best use.

• aiiixiii 13 Sep 2019 18:30 UTC

  2 points

  on: How do you iden­tify com­plex sys­tems?

  The most complex system is the one that can generate complex system itself, outside of biological reproduction. Based on this definition, human beings are the most complex biological systems that we know, even if it sound too anthropocentric.

• aiiixiii 7 Aug 2019 12:50 UTC

  3 points

  in reply to: TAG’s comment on: Weak foun­da­tion of de­ter­minism analysis

  A couple of points to your points.

  1) Bell’s inequalities only seem to disprove local realism. In addition, many scientists criticize the assumptions and, in any case, they are compatible with different deterministic systems or with non-local hidden variables, so it is far from being a definitive tool to prove or disprove determinism.

  2) If you take determinism in the broad sense as the main subject of the discourse, then eternalism is a subset of determinism and not vice versa. Other subsets may be: Hard determinism, MWI, Biological determinism, Theological determinism and many others.