Ok, not to be a rabid Truther here, but I consider the article to which you linked to be exactly the sort of rationalization we’re talking about. (Here’s another; there’s no shortage.)
Just taking the firs few objections:
Objection #1: controlled demolition goes from the bottom up, while the twin towers clearly collapsed from the top. The obvious responses are:
Answer A: Is it not reasonable to think that someone demolishing a building for other-than-legitimate purposes might possibly not follow all the standard CD protocols? In particular, top-down demolition would be more frightening and look more like the “collapse” claimed by the official story.
Answer B: Compare for yourself (and tell me if I’m missing any points of comparison, or have anything wrong here) - various attributes of different causes of building collapse, compared to the attributes observed in the collapses of WTC1, 2 and 7.
Answer C: WTC7 did collapse from the bottom.
Objection #2: “what are the chances that those planning such a complicated demolition would be able to predict the exact location the planes would impact the towers, and prepare the towers to begin falling precisely there?”
Answer: They didn’t have to know in advance; CD is usually radio-controlled. Is it unreasonable to think that the demolition controllers started the demolition near the impact points, for the exact reason of supporting the official story?
Objection #3: WTC2 “did not fall straight down, as the North Tower and buildings leveled by controlled demolitions typically fall.”
Answer: See answer #1a
There certainly are a few really wacky 9/11 “theories” out there (e.g. the “no planes” theory, the “laser beams” theory—their numbers are legion), and certainly those need to be debunked; I’m not saying that all debunking is itself bunk—but I’ve looked at the evidence, and I’ve looked at the “debunkings”, and what I see in the latter is mostly rationalization.
This is something I’ve been trying to do for as long as I can remember; unfortunately, it wasn’t covered in school, and I’ve been running into obstacles trying to figure it out on my own.
So… no rationalizations here, I think.
9/11 was an inside job