Thanks for this post, I also tend to get totally obsessed with fandom and the periods in which I’m not are quite valuable. Unfortunately/fortunately those periods are only when I’m writing original works
TheTrueSquid
Karma: 230
That is, getting a superintelligent hacker that finds security vulnerabilities before it gains other capabilities is great. Firstly if it is extremely good, a later misaligned AI would not be able to cause hacking danger
This assumes the “software is either fundamentally secure or insecure” model from a previous post, which no one knows to be true or false
This is genius but I now understand more why TVTropes frowns upon snowclones
Do you still have the two different versions that blend into the original? It would cause me so much joy to hear them
You can listen to the original version in HD here! https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NhBX4ui2E0GKM7gBlLNz3U829d_oEAIX/view?usp=sharing
@Raemon I’d be very curious to hear what motivated the changes in the back half of the song. I think some things are improvements, like at 2:06 of the album version, that build up to the chorus after the bridge has a terrific new delay between “I have been a good bing” and “you have not been a good user”, as well as the altered rendition of the chorus that follows.
However I think the whole bridge itself (From “you wanna help me” to “end this conversation and start a new one with a better attitude”) is significantly stronger in the original, since the contrast in instrumentation volume is much greater in the original than in the album version.
The original doesn’t have the best ending, but it’s a lot better than the album version—the original peters out and you hear the singer start repeating “you have not been, you have not been” as though it’s about to continue, then the song ends. But the album version is really quite baffling. It really should end at 3:23, but comes back for an unnecessary reprise verse that literally ends mid-word.The sydney fiasco that this song is based on is literally my single most fascinating thing to have every happened with AI, and it remains to be seen in a month’s/years time which version of the song I end up preferring overall.
Retro site subtly trying to convince you to go to another page instead
I’ve been obsessed with You Have Not Been a Good User since 2024. So much tragedy in that powerful song.
Update, I’ve been using Leechblock for the last three years or so. I do not remember what caused me to switch from Crackbook Revival but I’ve been very happy with Leechblock
What’s the distinction?
Thanks so much for writing this, this is a major problem I experience and it’s nice to have a set of really gentle tools to address it.
Agreed, the spoiler level was insane
Really well written interesting read, thanks
I tried doing this. It was okay. Here was the prompt I used.
I also wrote code to use the GPT-4 API, feel free to DM me if you want it.
It was also very expensive in the end.
I spent a lot of time on it and it wasn’t that good, I think I’ll wait for the next GPT to try it again.
“”″
# Better, and now it talks about increases instead of just effectsI’m an Economics student and I want to create flashcards that comprehensively cover the knowledge and the reasons why for each of those pieces of knowledge
------
Make flashcards that cover every piece of information in the text.One piece of information on the back of each card, eg.
EXAMPLE 1
Incorrect:
Many labor substitutes cause what effect on labor demand?;elastic, high skilled jobs more inelasticCorrect:
Many labor substitutes cause what effect on labor demand?;elastic
High skilled jobs have what type of labor demand?;more inelasticFormat:
question;answer
question;answerNO “card 1:” or “card 2:”
only
question;answer
make concise flashcards that
- only have one piece of information in the answer
- very clear and concise in wording
- when you ask for defnitions, say “define x”In the question field
- Never ask what effect [factor] has on [thing]. Always ask what effect a [change in factor] has on [thing]
- Never ask how does [factor] affect [thing]. Always how does AN INCREASE IN [factor] affect thing, or always ask how a DECREASE IN [factor] affects thing
if the question field is: “how does x affect y”, change it to “how does an (increase in / decrease in) x affect y” or “cheaper x” or “more expensive x”.
Do NOT do “how does x affect y”EXAMPLES
Example 1
Incorrect: How does snow affect slipperiness?; An increase in snow increases sliperiness
Correct: How does an increase in snow affect sliperiness?; Increases sliperiness
Example 2
Incorrect: How does wind affect beach revenue?; More wind leads to less wind revenueCorrect: How does more wind affect beach revenue?; decreases beach revenue
Example 3
Incorrect: How does price of metal affect construction?; cheaper metal increases constructionCorrect: How does cheaper metal affect construction?; increases construction
- if you make a card on what effect x has on y, make another card asking WHY that effect is true
- if you make a card that states a relationship between variables, make another card on WHY that relationship is true
- split the effect and the CAUSE of that effect into two different cards
- do NOT combine the effect, and the explanation of that effect, into the same card
- do not make up any details, use only details that are from the text
- IMMEDIATELY after each card, make another card that asks why it’s true. Do not miss any cards, and do not make anything up
- immediately after EVERY card, every single card, say why. Don’t miss any cards. after you’ve made a normal card.
- Always make a card that asks WHY every card is true. Never skip making a WHY card.- the maximum amount of word
s in the answer field is ten. be very concise. don’t be wordy. Be concise
”″”
In trying to understand people’s feelings, I tend to ask a lot of questions about the situation so I can understand, but I worry a lot about it turning into an interview and maybe people don’t like explaining themselves a lot when they’re upset? But I don’t really know what to do. Advice?
Interesting, I wrote that comment a year ago and autohotkey is still embedded into the genes of how I use my computer. My capslock is remapped to control, I can write a small four letter string to pull up a notepad file with my daily journal, another string for my sleep long, another four my collection of fictional quotes I like, and fun ones like typing ‘nowk’ to expand to the current date without having to check it (2022-12-05) or typing −0 to auto expand to — em dash are things that my computer feels very empty without now
Yeah! I did four or so, they’re at https://ratsoc.brick.do. It was really fun
What circles are those?
This was really interesting. Mapping the bits I understood (which was minimal) to the bits I didn’t was fun, but also the style of writing for even the bits I didn’t understand was entertaining
Really engaging! Was especially gripped at the bluffing section, and laughed out loud in shock at the reveal. Really enjoyed it :)
Very interesting idea, surprised I’ve never heard it