It works perfectly. Thanks again!
That looks perfect! I’ll test it out later.
My IRL rationality group is preparing to test that sequence. It looks promising, although we do have some quibbles with it. If we successfully finish testing, we’ll publish the details.
This may seem stupid, but I didn’t even think about doing odds calibration on such a small scale. That’s a great idea. Making a pinned Google Keep note now.
I was thinking “Tsuyoku Naritai”. 😊
If I understand you correctly, I wholeheartedly agree that “Less Wrong” is not just referring to a dichotomy of “what is true” and “what is wrong” (although that is part of it, ala ‘Map and Territory’).
There’s a reason rationality is often called “systemized winning”; while the goals that you are trying to win are entirely subjective, rationality can help you decide what is most optimal in your pursuit of goal Y.
Thank you for the encouragement! I hope I didn’t sound like I was fishing for that. I just wanted to emphasize my desire to seek any other more optimal paths.
Good idea! Get comfortable with my own journey before using someone else’s. Makes sense.
Yes! The facebook event page links to our Facebook group.
Just listened to that about 10 minutes ago. Good sequence.
When you say “assumption”, I hear “a thing that is accepted to be true”.
What changes in cognition when something is accepted as true?