links 05/04/26: https://roamresearch.com/#/app/srcpublic/page/05-04-2026
https://www.hyperdimensional.co/p/aviate-navigate-communicate Dean Ball has good ideas about governance for Mythos-style models that create security vulnerabilities.
yes, if we’re going to regulate AI capabilities, the government should pick a rule and stick to it, not permit models from its friends and forbid models from its enemies in the ad-hoc fashion the Trump Admin has been. Also, it probably makes more sense to have independent, government-licensed private organizations do the model evaluations than to do it within tiny CAISI.
https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/Merge%20Labs/29ff7e5f-0621-48c2-91d1-e9bfe60f505c “neuron whisperer” is a great job title for someone who specializes in neuronal culture. cells love to die, and no cells love to die as much as neurons. i hope they find their neuron whisperer.
https://reason.com/volokh/2026/05/03/how-european-libertarians-differ-from-american-ones/ European libertarians/classical-liberals seem neat.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synoptic_Gospels a catchall term for Matthew, Mark, and Luke, the Gospels that mostly cover overlapping narratives of Jesus’s life.
https://jonahsinick.github.io/faculty-faces/ranked.html the faces of different academic fields
https://www.bitsaboutmoney.com/archive/nonprofit-indicted-bank-fraud/ damning stuff about the SPLC and associated nonprofits, by Patrick McKenzie at his most acid. yes, it looks like they plainly broke the law by lying to banks about the shell companies used to pay hate group informants. Also, they may well have broken the law in additional ways, by campaigning to get fund transfers to Trump-supporting political donation groups blacklisted. (nonprofits are not allowed to take sides on political campaigns.)
In general, I’m sympathetic to private boycotts or corporate policies against speech they consider bigoted or otherwise inappropriate. Free speech and free association should protect private individuals and organizations who object to certain views and choose not to do business with those who express them. And there are views I find objectionable and prefer not to encounter, with different standards for different contexts.
but the campaigning behavior being described here seems legitimately horrible. this was not an organic expression of public distaste. it was also not a set of independent choices by corporate executives based on their own values. it was a manipulative and gross organized campaign. even where this sort of behavior is legal, it violates some of my strongly held intuitions about “minding one’s own business”. it is really not some activist group’s business to tell corporations who they may and may not platform or allow to access financial services! you can have an opinion, but you can’t presume to give orders when it’s not your company and not your money. and no business should be taking orders from people who, properly, are just bystanders who happen to have opinions; it’s astonishing that they did. Something very screwy went on here, and I think I understand some of the accusations over the past several years better than I used to.
links 5/7/26: https://roamresearch.com/#/app/srcpublic/page/05-07-2026
https://meaningness.substack.com/p/creating-conduits-visionary-actual David Chapman on how yidam practice actually works. Fascinating, and tempting!
I do have a sense of caution about what is essentially a polytheistic practice; I’m an atheist who’s generally fine with engaging in woo in a spirit of experiment, but I have a vague sense that dealing with gods is probably frowned upon by monotheists for good reason. It might do something to you that you wouldn’t want. In the same way that some people argue IFS can “give” people something more like multiple personalities when it’s healthier to be unified, I wonder if dealing with multiple gods might “break up” your sense that you live in one world/one reality. (A friend of mine used to joke that atheists believe in one god, Athe.)
https://frontier2025.netlify.app/ recent scientific progress
https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.10248 steering vectors in AI were an Arb Research project
https://openresearchinstitute.org/onboarding/A_B_U.html I like this A/B/U system.
When I encounter a claim, I can’t usually easily sort it into “I believe this” or “I don’t believe this”. There are other buckets, like “all I know is this guy said the thing, I cannot or have not compared it to my other beliefs to see what I think of it”. Epistemic systems need an “other” bucket, not “I think it’s true”, “I think it’s false” or even “I am uncertain”, but something like “unprocessed”. Most claims I read are unprocessed! (Certainly most upsetting claims go in the “gee, that would suck, wouldn’t it? i can’t stand to think about it!” bucket.)
I also like that U stands for “unclear, undefined, unknowable, or untrue”—i.e. anything where I don’t clearly recognize the truth of it. it’s caused a lot of anguish for me over the years when I can’t rule out that a claim might be true. In A/B/U, you don’t actually have to distinguish “true” from “false” every time; you distinguish “clearly true” from “everything that’s not clearly true”. Thinkers who throw up a lot of Us and not a lot of As or Bs (novel or familiar truths) are not necessarily wrong, but you’re not in a position where you should rationally trust them very far. (And, to put this more reassuringly, you are free to not trust them very far, you are not epistemically obliged to treat them as correct or to keep investigating until you can “disprove” their theories.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michel_de_Montaigne Fascinating guy. Marrano background! Humanist childhood!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Teutoburg_Forest this is what “Varus give me back my legions” is from.
https://conclave1492.com/ want.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Welding/comments/q57fpq/welders_of_reddit_is_anyone_in_a_shop_that/ apparently working with a welding robot is mostly about “feeding” the robot pieces
https://academic.oup.com/jeea/article-abstract/19/6/3104/6179884 as of 2021, robots do not reduce manufacturing employment in Germany; they shift it towards programming roles.
https://www.aiprm.com/robotics-statistics/ half of robots are used in “handling”. (such as pick & place.)
https://www.engineering.com/the-what-why-and-how-of-roboforming/ roboforming deforms a sheet of metal with a robot arm and steel ball; it’s a tooling-free replacement for stamping.
https://www2.census.gov/library/working-papers/2023/adrm/ces/CES-WP-23-14.pdf where robots are adopted
https://blog.atlascomputing.org/p/civilizations-maintenance-backlog good ideas for AI resilience
https://www.essentialtechnology.blog/cp/178994713 “Securing Critical Components of Cyberphysical Systems.” Seems like pure common sense with regards to software (I can’t evaluate the hardware claims.)
https://claude.ai/share/b675fa33-35a1-4aa7-a044-ea877ff4e643 discussion with Claude about supply chain risks from a world where AI agents do the purchasing. the “bullwhip effect” may be amplified, causing shortages and gluts.
https://arxiv.org/html/2502.11620v3 you can upper-bound AI-generated code correctness by looking at how much program behavior varies with rerolls of the same prompt. you can map programs into semantically equivalent clusters. if an AI agent produces lots of different clusters, they can’t all be correct, so any one of them is less likely to be correct.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guido_of_Siena good example of 13thc Sienese painting
https://messymatters.com/autonomy/ how Bethany Soule and Daniel Reeves stay financially independent while married. I’d never do this but it’s cool.
https://modernpower.substack.com/p/taking-stock-of-abundance-may-2026 state of the Abundance movement; much to consider.