economic incentives make it likely that ASI will be created in the near future
Military incentives, to win wars, matter much more.
rain8dome9
Karma: 27
consequentialist
You are talking about the unaligned AI that has good intentions for humanity? What about the self serving paper clip maximizer? Isn’t that a fairly large group too?
I think “its someone else’s problem to stop AI” and so sleep soundly.
The random historical event you read half a sentence about on Wikipedia and it caught your eye? Maybe that means that it could catch a lot of people’s eyes, and your quick post has brought it to them.
This feels like a recommendation to be entertaining and not informative.
Both medical advice and legal advice are categories where we only allow certified experts to speak freely,
In reddit’s legal advice forum commenters just proclaim their advice as not legal advice whether they are lawyers or not. Sometimes they recommend getting a lawyer instead of giving advice.
There are no clear solutions to what to do if you are in an environment with other smart actors[2] who are trying to predict what you are going to do and then try to feed you information to extract resources from you.
Get outside sources! Like public reputation.
Maybe the most challenging and productive application of LLMs is in science. Elicit.org’s technical blog post on the subject: https://elicit.com/blog/literature-based-discovery . They have an AI safety policy too: https://elicit.com/blog/ai-safety
Get a stationary bicycle (or treadmill desk). Work play games or watch TV while burning calories and building cardio.
Just do one new thing a day to solve one of your problems.
I feel like the word “learn” has to be in this sentence.
Yea electronic (screens?) have some weird neurological effect on me. I wish I learned to be satisfied with books and note taking.
The impersonal internet runs Kialo-like debates and builds complex wikis where data and arguments matter more than the pseudonymized person behind them. A hybrid of expert and blogger is generally seen as a failed specialization.
Persistence and collaborative writing will finish writing the common stuff faster and mean that only scholars will be left to work on this stuff.
Cross Validated Stack Exchange has a list of Bayes books recommended by their skilled community. Other SE sites probably also have textbook suggestions.
This problem inspired VV’s ‘Zones of Thought’ series. In those books the closer a character gets to the center of the galaxy the lower the maximum possible cognition even for an AGI.
The specific word ‘greyspaces’ makes me think of something like bad architecture a perspective on morality. Could you call this concept something else like ‘intermediary spaces’?
Thank you that works as desired!
I have see lots of advice on reddit, here and anki’s own forums about to formulate anki cards and use anki in general. Too much in fact. Sometimes its even contradictory. In the end I use some of it but ignored most. Alot of this has to do with the fact that the advice depends on the type of card and on you. If the card is just one word to another to automatize foreign language vocabulary you will want brevity speed fluency and more of these cards per day. If its cloze deletion to memorize a poem / notes card can not be brief and speed is not so important. If its a test like understanding a sentence of a foreign language then it wont go back into review and I do many of these cards irregardless of the count of new cards. I also suspect it depends on the user though I have not really had enough data to give examples. To further all of this including finding the right advice for each person, I have written some part of an analysis of anki data. Unfortunately not many people seem to care so I stopped. Please run this R notebook on your data.
Please give an example of JavaScript code that would make a minor wording tweak. I often find I need to not memorize the cue so precisely.
Why Mark Ruffalo? Will there be an audiobook? Edit: Yes; it can be preordered now.
“Random variable” is never defined. I though stochastic variable is just a synonym for random variable. I have seen posts where random variable is always written as r.v. and that helps a bit.
From Wikipedia: “In probability theory, the sample space (also called sample description space,[1] possibility space,[2] or outcome space[3]) of an experiment or random trial is the set of all possible outcomes or results of that experiment.
what is a measurable space?
“he function is constant,” you mean its just one outcome like a die that always lands on one side?
what makes a function measurable?
random variables
This term always sounds like it means a variable selected at random not a variable with randomness in it. Please use the term ‘stochastic variable’. Edit: or does it mean a variable composed entirely at random without any relation to any other variable?
Edit: I think this post would be much easier to learn from if it was a jupyter notebook with python code intermixed or R markdown. Sometimes the terminology gets away from me and seeing in code what is being said would really help understand what is going on as well as give some training on how to use this knowledge. Edit: there should be a plot illustrating ” which are jointly sampled according to a density .” including rugs for the marginal distributions. I could do that if anyone wants. Here is an example describing a different concept.
This is only true about linear relationships.