Firstly, a suit isn’t technically a neutral item. In my country, we have school uniforms, and I wore one for many years. The jacket fits poorly on almost everyone because it’s difficult to make. The pants are too thin even for autumn, and white shirts get dirty very quickly.
Secondly, a suit isn’t a neutral political statement. You may have heard of the Great Male Renunciation, but a suit is also a symbol of unification. The phenomenon that the King of England and the leader of China dressed differently in the 17th century, but now they dress almost identically, is a significant factor. Of course, you can adopt the status of everyone who wears a suit, just like you can adopt the status of military and police uniform wearers, but in my opinion, that’s not a good trend.
Thirdly, a suit isn’t beautiful. If you abstract away specific, well-made, and expensively produced examples, what remains? A certain style of fabric tailoring, suitable for a narrow range of situations. In general, Japanese culture beautifully displays hierarchically colored clothing, whether it’s business suits or maid outfits. On the other hand, there’s Wendy from Gravity Falls, Marceline from Adventure Time, Cornelia from W.I.T.C.H. Of course, you can love Luna Lovegood, who wore a school uniform, and generally, that layer of memories is hard to shake when you’ve met a lot of girls in suits. But it’s also connected to the tragedy of alienation—it’s rare to be able to build a marriage with a classmate or an office colleague.
In short: you’re promoting a policy I don’t like by aestheticizing the trappings of that policy.
The problem with the idea of cooking in a microwave for one person isn’t the word “microwave,” but the idea of ”for one person.” I live alone, and cooking is generally a pretty bad idea anyway. It’s a little cheaper, but the balance is generally in favor of prepared meals or cafes. In the USSR, there were even plans for apartments without kitchens. This concept largely failed due to the catastrophically low quality of public catering in the USSR. If you have a family, you need a full kitchen. If you live alone for a decade, ideally you’d have good cafeterias near your home that are frequented by more than just poor workers. In fact, this has been resolved by the availability of decent prepared meals in supermarkets. Overall, if the cheapest accommodations weren’t hostels or dormitories with a shared full kitchen, but rather micro-apartments with only a microwave, cooking in them would make sense, as it would save even more compared to cafeterias.