You can both believe that there is no objective morality, and think that if objective morality existed then you should follow it. my criticism is—he saying that if objective morality existed and you dont like it, you should ignore it. thats not logical.
Jorterder
Karma: −137
My critique of Eliezer’s deeply irrational beliefs
Jimmy Apples, source of the rumor that OpenAI has achieved AGI internally, is a credible insider.
Investigating the rumors of OpenAI achieving AGI
Real Meaning of life has been found. Eliezer discovered it in 2000′s.
This is not addressing my criticism. He is saying that if objective morality existed and you dont like it, you should ignore it. I am not saying that objective morality exists or not, but addressing the logic in hypothetical world where it does exist.
Criticism of Eliezer’s irrational moral beliefs
AI should be used to find better morality
Ai should find true target using rationality. It might not exist, which would mean there is no real positive utility. But it is rational to search for it, because it has no harm, and it might have benefit in case it exists.
Use sufficient intelligent AI to find objective morality. If it exists, if it makes sense. It will have better understanding of it than us. Of course, if that sufficiently intelligent AI doesn’t kill us all prior.