The drone occupation is far more likely than humanoid robots imo
edalva
Madison ACX Meetups Everywhere
Madison Winter ACX Meetup
Thanks!
Has this been done? I thought I saw that someone did something like this somewhere but I have lost the source.
There exists something (objective value) universally compelling that any sufficiently advanced mind (/bayesian agent) would recognize as valuable—something possibly beyond our evolutionary happenstance and/or something timeles
Hey Robert,
I was thinking about this post again when reading [No Universally Compelling Arguments](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/PtoQdG7E8MxYJrigu/no-universally-compelling-arguments) and was curious how you interperate this statement wrt to the post. Do you disagree with NUCA? do you have some other interpretation? Would be happy to hear what you think.
Eric
I have donated as well. I appreciate the work yall do.
I see and appreciate what you’re doing here ;)
(and what we will will change what will happen) (possibly to a Will) (unless our will won’t work)
the idea of a drone occupation is really interesting and not one I had considered. My thoughts on the war are that it seems really hard for the Iran government to trust any peace deal and they lose a lot of leverage if oil stocks recover during peace. I would put 30%+ on the US/ Israel killing senior leaders in Iran (in a style similar to the start of the war) within two years of a peace deal. I am not sure agreements could be made to seriously reduce those odds which makes me think the war will continue for a while. I am curious if others expect the same thing?
on the other hand oil market prices keep getting lower while stockpiles are declining, seems like the war will end? I just don’t understand why.
some links on oil prices
https://x.com/JKempEnergy/status/2065786844118167616?s=20
https://x.com/JKempEnergy/status/2065427997453099317?s=20