The relevant chapter is called “Human Nature is Bad”, and is mostly focused on the empirical question (or the interpretational question of what it means to be good or bad). It is mostly not an argument “look, you’re Confucian, and so you need to do the Confucian thing”, which would not be very interesting or compelling, but I do think it points towards the coherence of the different parts. If you try to pick and choose elements from the buffet without considering their interactions with each other, you will end up with a worse meal.
The relevant chapter is called “Human Nature is Bad”, and is mostly focused on the empirical question (or the interpretational question of what it means to be good or bad). It is mostly not an argument “look, you’re Confucian, and so you need to do the Confucian thing”, which would not be very interesting or compelling, but I do think it points towards the coherence of the different parts. If you try to pick and choose elements from the buffet without considering their interactions with each other, you will end up with a worse meal.