Second is that—if they want to make this kind of theoretical argument as a reason to criminalize future open source LLMs, then they really need to be a lot more rigorous, and consider counterfactual results more carefuly.
As aogara points out, the paper does not advocate criminalizing future open source LLMs, but instead advocates catastrophe liability and mandatory insurance for people who release the weights of LLMs.
As aogara points out, the paper does not advocate criminalizing future open source LLMs, but instead advocates catastrophe liability and mandatory insurance for people who release the weights of LLMs.