What, in your view, distinguishes “civil society” from “party apparatus”? Is it a more meaningful distinction than them speaking English instead of Russian?
Also, what is the “harm” you think Yarvin’s analogizing the American ruling system to that of the Soviet Union has done?
What, in your view, distinguishes “civil society” from “party apparatus”? Is it a more meaningful distinction than them speaking English instead of Russian?
Also, what is the “harm” you think Yarvin’s analogizing the American ruling system to that of the Soviet Union has done?