Rather than criticize your argument myself, let me just report that neither Bard nor Bing finds it particularly compelling—and their response is far more informative about how an AI might reason, than any comment by a human critic.
Apart from the fact that Bard and Bing don’t seem to be able to follow the argument put here, they are merely large language models, and often incorrect in their responses. Even if they were not, GIGO on the LLM means this reasoning amounts to an ad populum fallacy.
Rather than criticize your argument myself, let me just report that neither Bard nor Bing finds it particularly compelling—and their response is far more informative about how an AI might reason, than any comment by a human critic.
Apart from the fact that Bard and Bing don’t seem to be able to follow the argument put here, they are merely large language models, and often incorrect in their responses. Even if they were not, GIGO on the LLM means this reasoning amounts to an ad populum fallacy.