A large chunk of the point of Double Crux, IMO, is that questions substantial enough to have this sort of disagreement are almost always malformed.
The point of Double Crux is to reduce one question “should HPMOR be on the front page?” to another question that we both agree would answer the first question (“Did more than X% of people who read HPMOR radically have their life changed for the better?”)
> such as “we decided the question was malformed
A large chunk of the point of Double Crux, IMO, is that questions substantial enough to have this sort of disagreement are almost always malformed.
The point of Double Crux is to reduce one question “should HPMOR be on the front page?” to another question that we both agree would answer the first question (“Did more than X% of people who read HPMOR radically have their life changed for the better?”)