All reasonable points. I upvoted. however, I think you’re getting downvotes due to vagueness—precisely encoding these concepts in math, such that the math reliably teaches machine children about the shape of love, is not a trivial task. shard theory and mechanistic interpretability exist because it’s important that we be able to understand the shapes inside an ai and ensure the shape of caring is imprinted early; miri work exists because of the concern that the worst bad mutation an ai could have may be catastrophically terrible, and both ai and humans need to be careful about very powerful self modification; PIBBSS exists because the connection to other life sciences is surprisingly strong. I’m a huge fan of Michael Levin’s work, in particular, and his talk on the PIBBSS YouTube channel was super cool.
Seems like you’re on a good track in terms of English philosophy, I’d strongly encourage you to link the shapes of the referenced experiences to their math more clearly. Hope to hear more from you!
All reasonable points. I upvoted. however, I think you’re getting downvotes due to vagueness—precisely encoding these concepts in math, such that the math reliably teaches machine children about the shape of love, is not a trivial task. shard theory and mechanistic interpretability exist because it’s important that we be able to understand the shapes inside an ai and ensure the shape of caring is imprinted early; miri work exists because of the concern that the worst bad mutation an ai could have may be catastrophically terrible, and both ai and humans need to be careful about very powerful self modification; PIBBSS exists because the connection to other life sciences is surprisingly strong. I’m a huge fan of Michael Levin’s work, in particular, and his talk on the PIBBSS YouTube channel was super cool.
Seems like you’re on a good track in terms of English philosophy, I’d strongly encourage you to link the shapes of the referenced experiences to their math more clearly. Hope to hear more from you!